Enron Jurors Speak Out

"Those of us that have full-time jobs, we did our jobs at night when we went home so tired we hardly knew who we were. We were responsible, we were always accountable and we always found a way to circle back around to tie up the loose ends. And I think those employees were entitled to the same thing."

-- Carolyn Kuchera, juror in criminal case against Kenneth L. Lay and Jeffrey K. Skilling; quoted in The New York Times.

Here is an interesting interactive graphic of the jury panel, giving you information about each individual.

Tags:

Welfare reform workers protected by civil rights laws.

New York City has just settled a hard-fought battle against discrimination claims brought by welfare workers.

The City of New York has settled a lawsuit brought against it by the federal government alleging that the city violated the federal civil rights laws against employment discrimination by harassing women in the city's welfare-to-work program. The women alleged that supervisors at city agencies had harassed three women referred to those agencies as part of the city's Work Experience Program (WEP). The WEP is the program by which the city seeks to comply with the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, the federal welfare reform statute.New York City had sought to dismiss the government's complaint, arguing that because they were welfare recipients, the women were not "employees" protected by the federal civil rights laws from unlawful employment discrimination. Earlier this month, the Second Circuit ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, concluding that the women were employees entitled to the protection of the federal civil rights laws.Following this ruling, the City settled with the Plaintiffs, agreeing to monetary payouts to each of them. It also agreed to change its policies with regard to WEP employees.

Here is the New York Times article (subscription required).

Tags:

Update: Burlington Northern v. White oral argument.

As we have previously covered, the Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Burlington Northern Railway Co. v. White, in which the Court is to determine what constitutes actionable retaliation under Title VII. The Court has recently issued a transcript of the oral arguments in the case. They make for interesting and, in some cases, humorous reading.

Tags:

Update: The $1.7 Million Dollar Spanking

Update to our previous entry regarding the California woman that sued her company for its "team building" spanking practices. While we were out the last 2 weeks enjoying the sand and surf, a jury awarded Plaintiff Janet Orlando $1.7 million ($10,000 for economic loss, $40,000 for future medical costs, $450,000 for emotional distress, pain and suffering, and $1.2 million in punitive damages).

Now THAT is a spanking!

A great article from Workforce.com gives a taste of some of the evidence in the case along with some interesting interview snippets from the company's CEO and defense attorney. ______________PREVIOUS ENTRY_____________________Janet Orlando quit her job at the home security company Alarm One Inc. and sued, alleging discrimination, assault, battery and infliction of emotional distress. Closing arguments were held this week in the case in which the plaintiff is seeking $1.2 million in damages for workplace spankings. According to the story at CNN, employees were paddled with rival companies' yard signs as part of a contest that pitted sales teams against each other, according to court documents. The winners poked fun at the losers, throwing pies at them, feeding them baby food, making them wear diapers and swatting their buttocks. According to the article, Ms. Orlando's lawyer said the following in closing arguments:

"No reasonable middle-aged woman would want to be put up there before a group of young men, turned around to show her buttocks, get spanked and called abusive names, and told it was to increase sales and motivate employees."

In response, the company's lawyers (and at least one other HR Blogger I read regularly) questioned how this case could ever get to a jury b/c the company treated both sexes the same (i.e. forced both men and women to show their buttocks and be spanked, etc.). Frankly I don't think that is going to work as an automic defense in harassment cases.
While I don't know all of the facts of this particular case, I can certainly see how similar conduct applied equally to both genders might impact the genders differently. Do we really think company-wide "Topless Fridays" would fly even though it treats both genders equally?
Bottom line is this, these types of games just don't belong in the modern workplace. I personally guarantee this company will discontinue its spanking fun regardless of whether or not it gets tagged by the jury in this case. With litigation expenses and lost time costs considered, a win in court is really only slightly better than a loss. The only true victory for a company in the employment law setting is to avoid litigation in the first place.Categories:

SexualHarassment

Tags:

More Man Bites Dog

While it certainly isn't becoming commonplace, we have been noticing increasing chatter on employment-related blogs and news sources indicating an increasing trend of employers suing employees following termination of the employment relationship. The latest of these such cases comes from Delaware. U.S. Card Partner Services in Newark has sued a former sales director, claiming he overstated his qualifications to get the job, and once hired, made too many personal phone calls and played with his iPod too much.

The company not only fired him in July, it is now suing him in federal court, demanding that he pay back the $90,000 he was paid in salary plus an additional $210,000 in profits that the company believes it lost because of his poor job performance. Frankly, it is really difficult to see the logic behind such an overly aggresive tactic being taken by an employer. I think most attorneys would agree that the company has slightly less than 0% chance of recovering lost profits in such a case. Given that fact, the case just doesn't seem to make good business sense. Perhaps, however, there are facts or circumstances that have yet to come to light.

Hat tip to Labor Prof Blog for the story.Categories:HRPolicies

Tags:

Gone to Margaritaville

We are on vacation. We'll be back next week with more HR Law goodness.

Tags: