<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>HR Lawyer's Blog</title>
      <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/</link>
      <description />
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:20:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:20:44 -0600</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.34</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/index.xml" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:feedFlare xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrlawyersblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrlawyersblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrlawyersblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" href="http://www.rojo.com/add-subscription?resource=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrlawyersblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://blog.rojo.com/RojoWideRed.gif">Subscribe with Rojo</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/index.xml" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrlawyersblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrlawyersblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrlawyersblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><item>
         <title>ADA Amendments Act Working Its Way Through Congress</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/08/articles/case-opinions/ada-amendments-act-working-its-way-through-congress/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/08/articles/case-opinions/ada-amendments-act-working-its-way-through-congress/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Case Opinions</category><category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">HR Management</category><category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Legislation</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:17:28 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>A large, bipartisan group of senators signed on as co-sponsors of the ADA Amendments Act (S.3406) which was introduced August 1. The bill will strengthen the protections of the original Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), passed in 1990.



Sens. Tom Harkin, D. Iowa, and Orrin Hatch, R. Utah, led the effort to sign on 66 senators as co-sponsors of the bill.&amp;nbsp; With so many co-sponsors, there is a good chance that the Senate leadership will bring the bill to the floor to a vote.



The...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=TPNdmK"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=TPNdmK" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=q5VPhK"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=q5VPhK" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=5fBONk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=5fBONk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=UDj8LK"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=UDj8LK" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item>
         <title>Guest Post: Ask Wise Questions Before Terminating An Employee</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/07/articles/hr-management/guest-post-ask-wise-questions-before-terminating-an-employee/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/07/articles/hr-management/guest-post-ask-wise-questions-before-terminating-an-employee/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">HR Management</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:55:06 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>Lessons From a Hotel Lobby



We think we shape life. That&amp;rsquo;s wrong. Life shapes us. All

readers know how they first learned this. Here&amp;rsquo;s my story,

one that will help corporate counsel when it comes to decid-

ing whether to impose the equivalent of capital punishment in

employment: termination.



It was 1975. Much to my mother&amp;rsquo;s dismay, I dropped out of

college, moved to Washington, D.C., and started to work at a

large, 800-room convention hotel as a desk clerk. Working...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=CV7ocJ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=CV7ocJ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=O4vu5J"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=O4vu5J" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=M8Oxnj"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=M8Oxnj" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=DpuXjJ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=DpuXjJ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item>
         <title>Plaintiff Awarded $46 Million Dollar Verdict in Retaliation Case</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/07/articles/case-opinions/plaintiff-awarded-46-million-dollar-verdict-in-retaliation-case/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/07/articles/case-opinions/plaintiff-awarded-46-million-dollar-verdict-in-retaliation-case/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Age Discrimination</category><category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Case Opinions</category><category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">HR Management</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:16:16 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>An Ohio jury recently awarded the largest verdict in Ohio history -- $46.7 million -- to a man who they said was wrongfully fired last year.&amp;nbsp; This is the largest employment verdict I have seen, possibly ever.&amp;nbsp;

 Ronald Luri, 55, accused Republic Services Inc. of retaliation and of forging documents critical of his job performance after he refused to fire three of his employees -- all about 60 years old -- on the grounds that such actions would constitute age-discrimination. 

The jury...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=mCLpnJ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=mCLpnJ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=J4VYzJ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=J4VYzJ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=W1OQej"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=W1OQej" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=DBpSRJ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=DBpSRJ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item>
         <title>ADA Restoration Bill Passed</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/06/articles/disability-discrimination/ada-restoration-bill-passed/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/06/articles/disability-discrimination/ada-restoration-bill-passed/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Disability Discrimination</category><category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">HR Management</category><category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Legislation</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:36:21 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>The New York Times is reporting that the U.S. House has passed a major civil rights bill on Wednesday that would expand protections for people with disabilities and overturn several Supreme Court decisions issued in the last decade.&amp;nbsp; We previously addressed this bill here.&amp;nbsp; 



The bill, which was approved 402 to 17, would make it easier for workers to prove discrimination. It would explicitly relax some stringent standards set by the court and says that disability is to be...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=6XGQxI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=6XGQxI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=B8SbiI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=B8SbiI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=c7vgei"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=c7vgei" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=jkpf2I"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=jkpf2I" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item>
         <title>Disability Advocates Working with Business Leaders to Achieve Compromise on ADA Restoration Act</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/06/articles/disability-discrimination/disability-advocates-working-with-business-leaders-to-achieve-compromise-on-ada-restoration-act/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/06/articles/disability-discrimination/disability-advocates-working-with-business-leaders-to-achieve-compromise-on-ada-restoration-act/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Disability Discrimination</category><category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Legislation</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:57:42 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>House Leaders are working on H.R. 3195, the ADA Restoration Act, a bill that had prompted a lot of concern with the business associations. 



Disability activists and business representatives have come together to agree on language that helps clarify the Americans with Disabilities Act, protects and strengthens the protections for the disabled &amp;mdash; covering people who should be covered &amp;ndash; while seeking to avoid the more onerous and expensive rules that employers fear.

According to...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=3QjAzI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=3QjAzI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=yRBMhI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=yRBMhI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=dGSR7i"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=dGSR7i" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=kAQieI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=kAQieI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item>
         <title>And you thought you had it rough at work...</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/05/articles/hr-management/and-you-thought-you-had-it-rough-at-work/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/05/articles/hr-management/and-you-thought-you-had-it-rough-at-work/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">HR Management</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 06:19:43 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>Here is a funny for the end of the week:






&amp;amp;amp;lt;a href=&amp;amp;amp;quot;http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/e5714a96a4&amp;amp;amp;quot; _fcksavedurl=&amp;amp;amp;quot;http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/e5714a96a4&amp;amp;amp;quot;&amp;amp;amp;gt;Angry Boss w/ Will Ferrell&amp;amp;amp;lt;/a&amp;amp;amp;gt; on &amp;amp;amp;lt;a href=&amp;amp;amp;quot;http://www.funnyordie.com/&amp;amp;amp;quot; _fcksavedurl=&amp;amp;amp;quot;http://www.funnyordie.com/&amp;amp;amp;quot;&amp;amp;amp;gt;FunnyOrDie.com&amp;amp;amp;lt;/a&amp;amp;amp;gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=6345kH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=6345kH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=N18G1H"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=N18G1H" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=uOEMrh"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=uOEMrh" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=bnQjsH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=bnQjsH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item>
         <title>Supreme Court Issues Two Important Retaliation Decisions</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/05/articles/case-opinions/supreme-court-issues-two-important-retaliation-decisions/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/05/articles/case-opinions/supreme-court-issues-two-important-retaliation-decisions/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Age Discrimination</category><category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Case Opinions</category><category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Race Discrimination</category><category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/tags">Scotus</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 09:20:21 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>The Supreme Court issued two important decisions this week regarding whether retaliation claims may be brought under 42 U.S.C. s 1981 and the ADEA section dealing with federal employees.&amp;nbsp; 



Gomez-Perez v. Potter, No. 06-1321 (U.S. May 27, 2008) - The plaintiff in Gomez-Perez alleged that after she complained about age discrimination at her federal employer, she was retaliated against in various ways.&amp;nbsp; She challenged that retaliation under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=cynUNH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=cynUNH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=igVIXH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=igVIXH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=jgilPh"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=jgilPh" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=5HD3ZH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=5HD3ZH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item><title>Links for 2008-05-22 [del.icio.us]</title><link>http://del.icio.us/mckinneylaw#2008-05-22</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">http://del.icio.us/mckinneylaw#2008-05-22</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyle/content/may2008/bw20080520_095683.htm?campaign_id=rss_tech">Gary Vaynerchuk Is Thirsty</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.doshdosh.com/strategic-collaborations-a-powerful-way-to-promote-yourself/">Strategic Collaborations: A Powerful Way to Promote Yourself</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/05/articles/overtime-law-1/tyson-foods-files-reply-brief-in-effort-to-have-supreme-court-redefine-work/">Tyson Foods Files Reply Brief in Effort to have Supreme Court Redefine Work : HR Lawyer's Blog</a></li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded><description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyle/content/may2008/bw20080520_095683.htm?campaign_id=rss_tech"&gt;Gary Vaynerchuk Is Thirsty&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.doshdosh.com/strategic-collaborations-a-powerful-way-to-promote-yourself/"&gt;Strategic Collaborations: A Powerful Way to Promote Yourself&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/05/articles/overtime-law-1/tyson-foods-files-reply-brief-in-effort-to-have-supreme-court-redefine-work/"&gt;Tyson Foods Files Reply Brief in Effort to have Supreme Court Redefine Work : HR Lawyer's Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item><item>
         <title>Tyson Foods Files Reply Brief in Effort to have Supreme Court Redefine "Work"</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/05/articles/overtime-law-1/tyson-foods-files-reply-brief-in-effort-to-have-supreme-court-redefine-work/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/05/articles/overtime-law-1/tyson-foods-files-reply-brief-in-effort-to-have-supreme-court-redefine-work/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Case Opinions</category><category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Overtime Law</category><category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Wage &amp; Hour Law</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 14:00:43 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>On Tuesday, the petitioner filed this reply brief in the case of Tyson Foods, Inc. v. de Ascencio.  The issue is &amp;ldquo;whether the time spent donning light protective gear constitutes &amp;lsquo;work&amp;rsquo; under the Fair Labor Standards Act if the activities do not require a significant level of exertion.&amp;rdquo;  The cert. petition can be found here and the respondent&amp;rsquo;s brief in opposition here, while the opinion of the Third Circuit can be found here.



Related Posts:

    Tyson Wants...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=zhspKH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=zhspKH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=qRfCtH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=qRfCtH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=HHsggh"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=HHsggh" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=YMBenH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=YMBenH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item><title>Links for 2008-05-21 [del.icio.us]</title><link>http://del.icio.us/mckinneylaw#2008-05-21</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">http://del.icio.us/mckinneylaw#2008-05-21</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://marketingintegrity.wordpress.com/2008/05/21/e-mail-pick-up-the-phone/">E-Mail: Pick Up The Phone &laquo; Marketing Integrity</a></li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded><description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://marketingintegrity.wordpress.com/2008/05/21/e-mail-pick-up-the-phone/"&gt;E-Mail: Pick Up The Phone &amp;laquo; Marketing Integrity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item><item>
         <title>Eighth Circuit Ignores Supreme Court Desert Palace Decision</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/05/articles/age-discrimination-1/eighth-circuit-ignores-supreme-court-desert-palace-decision/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/05/articles/age-discrimination-1/eighth-circuit-ignores-supreme-court-desert-palace-decision/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Age Discrimination</category><category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Case Opinions</category><category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Disability Discrimination</category><category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Race Discrimination</category><category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Sexual Discrimination</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 08:46:07 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>This week the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in Gross v. FBL Financial Services, No. 07-1490 (8th Cir. May 14, 2008), ignoring the Supreme Court's opinion in Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa, 539 U.S. 90 (2003).



The issue has to do with the question of whether so-called &amp;quot;direct evidence&amp;quot; is still required in order to obtain a &amp;quot;mixed-motive&amp;quot; jury instruction.&amp;nbsp; The direct evidence standard was formulated by Justice O'Connor in her Price Waterhouse v....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=wHUS6H"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=wHUS6H" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=R8tscH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=R8tscH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=Dhupsh"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=Dhupsh" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=j3SoLH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=j3SoLH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item>
         <title>Senate Republicans Block Fair Pay Measure</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/04/articles/sexual-discrimination/senate-republicans-block-fair-pay-measure/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/04/articles/sexual-discrimination/senate-republicans-block-fair-pay-measure/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Legislation</category><category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Sexual Discrimination</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:37:46 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>Senate Republicans on Wednesday blocked a measure intended to overturn a Supreme Court decision limiting pay discrimination suits in a politically charged vote certain to be replayed in the presidential and Congressional campaigns.  



By a vote of 56 to 42, the Senate fell four votes short of the 60 required to begin consideration of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, named for an Alabama woman who lost a case against the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company when the court found she not did file...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=Xd9YOI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=Xd9YOI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=dwkW8I"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=dwkW8I" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=depRli"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=depRli" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=GLyyPI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=GLyyPI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item>
         <title>Starbucks Ordered to Pay $100 Million in Swiped Tips</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/03/articles/wage-hour-law/starbucks-ordered-to-pay-100-million-in-swiped-tips/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/03/articles/wage-hour-law/starbucks-ordered-to-pay-100-million-in-swiped-tips/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Wage &amp; Hour Law</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:36:19 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>Last week a California court ordered Starbucks to pay its California baristas more than $100 million in back tips and interest that the coffee chain paid to shift supervisors.&amp;nbsp; California law prohibits managers and supervisors from sharing in employee gratuities.&amp;nbsp; According to the court's finding, Starbucks illegally took a huge amount of money from the tip pool to pay shift supervisors, rather than paying them directly.



Starbucks spokeswoman Valerie O'Neil said the company planned...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=j2qz2I"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=j2qz2I" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=emFI4I"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=emFI4I" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=rG44ri"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=rG44ri" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=QRT1JI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=QRT1JI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item>
         <title>New Website Design</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/03/articles/hr-management/new-website-design/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/03/articles/hr-management/new-website-design/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">HR Management</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:12:47 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>Thanks to Mike Fox of Jottings by an Employer's Lawyer for his mention of our site's new design.&amp;nbsp; It's my hope that the new layout will give visitors easier access to useful information on our site.



If you have not already done so, I would encourage you to visit Jottings and bookmark it.&amp;nbsp; It is truly one of the finest information sources for anyone working in HR.&amp;nbsp; It is one of the few sites that I check every single day.&amp;nbsp; You should too.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=HVFOBI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=HVFOBI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=xH8HgI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=xH8HgI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=j1ez3i"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=j1ez3i" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=k5DUQI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=k5DUQI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item>
         <title>Supreme Court: EEOC Intake Questionnaire Counts as a Formal Charge</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/03/articles/case-opinions/supreme-court-eeoc-intake-questionnaire-counts-as-a-formal-charge/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/03/articles/case-opinions/supreme-court-eeoc-intake-questionnaire-counts-as-a-formal-charge/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Case Opinions</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:03:10 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>In Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki, the United State Supreme Court ruled that the EEOC's Intake Questionnaire adequately meets the requirements of a "Charge" to trigger an employee's rights to sue his or her employer in court. The plaintiff submitted to the EEOC an Intake Questionnaire with an affidavit contending that her employer was engaging in age discrimination. The EEOC did nothing with the Questionnaire for six months. The employer was not notified and no charge number was assigned....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=2UrXDI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=2UrXDI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=l694gI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=l694gI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=tzDAEi"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=tzDAEi" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=x50ZeI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=x50ZeI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item>
         <title>Democrats Oppose FMLA Changes</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/02/articles/fmla/democrats-oppose-fmla-changes/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/02/articles/fmla/democrats-oppose-fmla-changes/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">FMLA</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:02:54 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>Democrats on Congressional Hill are voicing opposition to the proposed changes to the FMLA implementing regulations recently announced by the U.S. Department of Labor. 


Senators Chris Dodd (D-CT) and Edward Kennedy (D-MA) recently expressed their concern that the proposed changes would discourage employees from exercising their right to take family and medical leave.  Senator Dodd, the Subcommittee chairman and sponsor of the original FMLA, identified proposals allowing employers to require...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=wKYQEI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=wKYQEI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=g8be1I"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=g8be1I" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=ssXqsi"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=ssXqsi" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=Ss5vCI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=Ss5vCI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item>
         <title>Texas Primary-Caucus Combo Explained</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/02/articles/texas-primarycaucus-combo-explained/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/02/articles/texas-primarycaucus-combo-explained/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/">Articles</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:02:48 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>I seem to be queried almost daily these last few weeks about the intricacies of the Texas Primary/Caucus system.  Believe me when I tell you that it is not something they cover in law school.  


So to the rescue comes this NPR interview of Kenneth Molberg.  Mr. Molberg is a friend who also is a member of the Texas State Democratic Executive Committee.  He is also currently running for the bench in Dallas County.  


Ken does a great job explaining both the mechanics and history of the...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=tscczI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=tscczI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=34UkNI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=34UkNI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=ET45qi"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=ET45qi" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=hSGHAI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=hSGHAI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item>
         <title>More Supreme Court Employment Law Activity this Week</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/02/articles/case-opinions/more-supreme-court-employment-law-activity-this-week/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/02/articles/case-opinions/more-supreme-court-employment-law-activity-this-week/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Case Opinions</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:02:12 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>Two interesting cases are being argued this week in the Supreme court:


On Tuesday, the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Gomez-Perez v. Potter (06-1321), on whether the Age Discrimination in Employment Act bars retaliation by public employers for the filing of age discrimination complaints.


On Wednesday, the Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in CBOCS West v. Humphries (06-1431), on whether employees may bring race retaliation claims under 42 USC 1981.


In  Gomez-Perez v....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=AH4yhI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=AH4yhI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=uw8OuI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=uw8OuI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=4zZFhi"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=4zZFhi" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=a2s6PI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=a2s6PI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item>
         <title>Tyson Wants High Court to Redefine "Work"</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/02/articles/case-opinions/tyson-wants-high-court-to-redefine-work/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/02/articles/case-opinions/tyson-wants-high-court-to-redefine-work/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Case Opinions</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:02:09 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>Lawyers for Tyson Foods are challenging a U.S. appeals court ruling that compensable work includes the putting on and taking off of protective work clothing and are calling on the Supreme Court to resolve what the company claims to be a conflict in the courts of appeal.


Monday's petition for a writ of certiorari was filed with the Supreme Court by attorneys representing poultry processor Tyson Foods Inc., which faces more than 30 wage-and-hour lawsuits on behalf of tens of thousands of...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=V2vIEI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=V2vIEI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=Y3ynmI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=Y3ynmI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=zrMcri"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=zrMcri" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=WekTkI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=WekTkI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item>
         <title>Honolulu jury awards $3M to city ex-official in whistleblower case.</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/01/articles/case-opinions/honolulu-jury-awards-3m-to-city-exofficial-in-whistleblower-case/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/01/articles/case-opinions/honolulu-jury-awards-3m-to-city-exofficial-in-whistleblower-case/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Case Opinions</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:01:51 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>A Circuit Court jury Friday awarded a former Honolulu city official more than $3 million dollars, upholding her claim that she lost her job in 2003 for blowing the whistle on what she saw as wrongdoing in the administration of the former Mayor.


The jury deliberated a half-day before returning a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding her just more than $1 million in lost wages and retirement benefits and $2 million in general damages for pain and suffering inflicted on her by city...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=V2eduI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=V2eduI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=7Xc49I"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=7Xc49I" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=M2n52i"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=M2n52i" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=gWCOPI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=gWCOPI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item>
         <title>Labor Case Set for Oral Argument at Supreme Court</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/01/articles/case-opinions/labor-case-set-for-oral-argument-at-supreme-court/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/01/articles/case-opinions/labor-case-set-for-oral-argument-at-supreme-court/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">Case Opinions</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:01:16 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>Chamber of Commerce v. Brown has been set for argument by the Supreme Court for March 19th.  The Court is set to decide whether the National Labor Relations Act preempts a California law barring private employers from using state grant or program funds to influence union organizing campaigns.


You can find the case briefing here.  

Source: ScotusBlog&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=DWi5AI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=DWi5AI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=6M49MI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=6M49MI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=dUnuzi"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=dUnuzi" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=nEqUwI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=nEqUwI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
            <item>
         <title>Adventures in Questionable HR Management</title>
         
         <link>http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/01/articles/hr-management/adventures-in-questionable-hr-management/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/2008/01/articles/hr-management/adventures-in-questionable-hr-management/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.hrlawyersblog.com/articles">HR Management</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:01:28 -0600</pubDate>
         <author>chris@themckinneylawfirm.com (Christopher McKinney)</author>
      
      <description>Yes friends, it's time once again to issue our Questionable HR Management Award Grand Prize.  As you know we periodically hand out this prestigious award to a company that has shown particularly bad HR judgment and a complete lack of common sense.  


Today the award goes to Packaging Corporation of America in Counce, Tenn. for its inadvisable termination of an employee in response to said employee's election to the Mississippi State Senate.  According to the Clarion Ledger, Freshman state Sen....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=Q8UguI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=Q8UguI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=firfzI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=firfzI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=TqyF1i"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=TqyF1i" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?a=3ctlcI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HrLawyersBlog?i=3ctlcI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item>
      
   <feedburner:awareness xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://api.feedburner.com/awareness/1.0/GetFeedData?uri=HrLawyersBlog</feedburner:awareness><item><title>Links for 2007-08-17 [del.icio.us]</title><link>http://del.icio.us/mckinneylaw#2007-08-17</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">http://del.icio.us/mckinneylaw#2007-08-17</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2007/08/whats-an-eeoc-d.html">Workplace Prof Blog: What's an EEOC Determination Worth?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2007/08/fedex-ground-dr.html">Workplace Prof Blog: FedEx Ground Drivers Are &quot;Employees,&quot; . . .</a></li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded><description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2007/08/whats-an-eeoc-d.html"&gt;Workplace Prof Blog: What's an EEOC Determination Worth?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2007/08/fedex-ground-dr.html"&gt;Workplace Prof Blog: FedEx Ground Drivers Are &amp;quot;Employees,&amp;quot; . . .&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item><item><title>Links for 2007-04-15 [del.icio.us]</title><link>http://del.icio.us/mckinneylaw#2007-04-15</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">http://del.icio.us/mckinneylaw#2007-04-15</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://view.exacttarget.com/?ffcb10-fe5815707d6200747113-fe5d1376716402797610-ff3516707661#Article1">Benefits Alert - Open Wide And Say Ah: It's HIPAA Checkup Time</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2007/04/8th_cir_no_need.html">Workplace Prof Blog: 8th Cir: No Need to Plead Exhaustion of Administration Remedies in Title VII Case</a></li>
<li><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/2007/04/another_outrage.php">Effect Measure</a></li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded><description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://view.exacttarget.com/?ffcb10-fe5815707d6200747113-fe5d1376716402797610-ff3516707661#Article1"&gt;Benefits Alert - Open Wide And Say Ah: It's HIPAA Checkup Time&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2007/04/8th_cir_no_need.html"&gt;Workplace Prof Blog: 8th Cir: No Need to Plead Exhaustion of Administration Remedies in Title VII Case&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/2007/04/another_outrage.php"&gt;Effect Measure&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item><item><title>Links for 2007-02-19 [del.icio.us]</title><link>http://del.icio.us/mckinneylaw#2007-02-19</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">http://del.icio.us/mckinneylaw#2007-02-19</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_50/b4013001.htm">Smashing The Clock</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,247302,00.html">Study Says Light-Skinned Immigrants in U.S. Make More Money Than Darker-Skinned Ones</a></li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded><description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_50/b4013001.htm"&gt;Smashing The Clock&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,247302,00.html"&gt;Study Says Light-Skinned Immigrants in U.S. Make More Money Than Darker-Skinned Ones&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item><item><title>Links for 2007-02-18 [del.icio.us]</title><link>http://del.icio.us/mckinneylaw#2007-02-18</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">http://del.icio.us/mckinneylaw#2007-02-18</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.employmentlawcolorado.com/archives/143">Employee Sues IBM for His Internet Addiction</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/02/15/military-leaves-from-work-heavily-protected/">Military Leaves from Work Heavily Protected</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/ihc/PubArticleIHC.jsp?id=1171447377945">Eye-Impaired Jail Officer's Case Tests Limits of Reasonable Accommodation</a></li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded><description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.employmentlawcolorado.com/archives/143"&gt;Employee Sues IBM for His Internet Addiction&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/02/15/military-leaves-from-work-heavily-protected/"&gt;Military Leaves from Work Heavily Protected&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/ihc/PubArticleIHC.jsp?id=1171447377945"&gt;Eye-Impaired Jail Officer's Case Tests Limits of Reasonable Accommodation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item><item><title>Links for 2007-01-21 [del.icio.us]</title><link>http://del.icio.us/mckinneylaw#2007-01-21</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">http://del.icio.us/mckinneylaw#2007-01-21</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.lawmemo.com/blog/2007/01/supreme_court_w.html">Supreme Court will decide ERISA fiduciary case. - Ross' Employment Law Blog</a></li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded><description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lawmemo.com/blog/2007/01/supreme_court_w.html"&gt;Supreme Court will decide ERISA fiduciary case. - Ross' Employment Law Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item></channel>
</rss>
